The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing

The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing

Blog Article

I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was creating more strain and was slower compared to the aged things. I don't try to remember if I even tried out frequent h4831 or not; I'm considering not.

I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was creating far more tension and was slower as opposed to aged stuff. I do not try to remember if I even attempted standard h4831 or not; I am wondering not. Click on to extend...

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo creates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps out of a 26" barrel. I exploit this similar powder in my 300wm capturing 180gr products, so It truly is nice to acquire one particular powder for each.

I have experienced some rifles that fouled actually lousy. Receiving all of the copper out was a true PIA until finally I discovered Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

Yup or it will not likely get the job done well. And Because the OP incorporates a load working with Varget I might try out to search out anyone to trade with. Might come up with a win get predicament.

I'm sure, tough instances. H4831SC will definitely perform, I just did not like the case density when loaded lengthy. I don't keep in mind powder charge off the best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which is exactly where I usually aim to generally be. In the circumstance making use of what you might have (and what I should have accomplished) I'd start with the top with the bearing floor in the bullet correct at the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you locate a velocity node.

If there's no load data it can be simply because this powder is just not well suited for this cartridge. Generally a h4831sc load data single will likely not come across 1 powder to suit all cartridges, along with the family members of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you will be asking about won't operate.

While this might be real, there is a large amount much more to it than just not blowing by yourself h4831sc load data up. He couldn't hit prairie canines over and above about one hundred fifty yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion was not accomplishing anything favorable for his grouping capability with Individuals loads.

At the moment utilizing IMR 4831 inside of a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked choice for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. Apart from it remaining limited cut, what on earth is the main difference in both of these powders, and will I swap to H4831sc?

It is really funny how through the years loading innumerable various cartridges in numerous rifles which i haven't acquired satisfactory conclusion results with H-4831 or even the quick-Slash Model.

I needed a tiny bit additional myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to become covered for quite a while (and also have lots of the exact same lots of powder).

Immediately after looking at this informative article (and lots of Other people, but this a person is easily the most data pushed with multiple accredited shooters) I have stopped stressing about touching or getting in just a magical distance through the lands, and began h4831sc load data loading wherever I could optimize a number of components of a load. Just my .02, with any luck , you can get one thing to work for ya.

Am i able to suppose that H4831 can be substituted for H4831sc ? I am aware the Bodily difference but will it influence the burn or velocity? I feel not but I'm not one hundred% sure.

I found that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions have been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min prices. I’m talking 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it had been a small 60s grain cost in a Norma scenario. Not what I had been seeking, but accurate Even so.